Quarter 3 COI Summary and Takeaways
University of Tennessee, Recruiting Violations
Key Takeaways: Provide mandatory beginning of the year education for football staff coaches and all staff that assist with visits on what is permissible during official and unofficial visits.
Level: Level I-Standard (institution) and Level I-Aggravated (head coach and director of football recruiting).
Facts: Tennessee failed to monitor their football program when committing 18 Level I violations involving recruiting rules. These violations revolved around providing impermissible inducements and benefits to PSAs and their families, current student-athletes and their families, individuals associated with a prospect, and boosters.
Over the course of two years, the football program acted impermissibly by paying for prospects’ expenses when they came on unofficial visits. Before a prospect came to campus, the former recruiting director would work with an assistant coach and arrange hotel rooms that would be paid for in cash prior to the prospect’s arrival. The staff would also regularly call restaurants prospects were going to eat and ask them to hold the prospect’s bill so a football staff member could come by and pay it later in cash. The football staff avoided detection of these violations by creating two different itineraries. The one sent to compliance only contained permissible activities and the other would include the activities that would not have been approved by compliance.
During the Covid-19 dead period the football staff also arranged for six prospects to visit campus and asked enrolled student-athletes to assist in showing the prospects around. Compliance was never informed about any of these visits. When students began returning to campus, the football staff moved the visits farther away from campus to avoid detection.
Two prospects who later enrolled at the institution received cash payments from the former head coach and his wife. Prior to enrollment Prospect 1’s mother received $6,000 in cash to use as down payment on a car. After he enrolled at the institution, the former head coach’s wife provided Prospect 1’s mother with $500 a month at least 25 times. When Prospect 1’s mother decided to move to the institution’s locale, the former head coach’s wife introduced her to a real estate agent who was a booster to the prospect’s mother find a place to live. The head coach’s wife provided $1,600 to the mother to assist with a deposit on her rental home.
When Prospect 2 was moving in, his mother told the head coach that she needed a medical procedure but could not pay for it due to her outstanding debt. The head coach later handed her an envelope with approximately $3,000 in cash. The head coach also gave Prospect 2’s mother $300 in cash for gas money.
In total, from January 2019 through November 2020 the program provided 13 prospects and their families with cost-free hotel lodging, meals, entertainment, transportation, cash payments and/or Tennessee-branded clothing and merchandise, all of which totaled $3,919. The football program also provided seven student-athletes with a total of $1,338 in cash payments to offset their expenses, related to hosting prospects in connection with the visits.
Bylaw Violations Found:
Penalties:
Core Penalties for Level I – Standard Violations (Institution)
Core Penalties for Level I – Aggravated Violations
Core Penalties for Level I – Standard Violations
Additional Penalties for Level I-Standard Violations
emphasis on recruiting operations for all football personnel that includes one more representatives from the NCAA and/or SEC.
Morgan State, Impermissible Tryouts
Key Takeaways: Coordinate practice visits with unofficial visits to ensure there is no impermissible participation with prospects.
Level: Level II – Standard (institution and head coach).
Facts: The softball coaching staff committed recruiting violations when they conducted impermissible tryouts with four prospective student-athletes at both institutional and off-campus facilities.
Twice the head coach arranged to meet PSA 1 at an off-campus facility and provided instruction while she pitched. On one of the instances PSA 1 was pitching to an enrolled student-athlete. On an unofficial visit to the institution, PSA 2 was given a tour by an enrolled student-athlete and then invited to field ground balls with the student-athlete and coach at the athletics facility. PSA 3 took an unofficial visit to campus and attended softball practice. At practice she was invited to join the team and field fly balls in the outfield with other student-athletes. She then went to an institutional facility where the softball staff watched her swing to judge her wrist speed. PSA 4 took an unofficial visit to the institution and the head coach and his staff watched her pitch to an enrolled student-athlete at an institutional facility.
The head softball coach knew the violations he was involved in were impermissible and he did not report the violations to compliance.
Bylaw Violations Found:
Penalties:
Core Penalties for Level II – Standard Violations
Additional Penalties for Level II – Standard Violations
University of Massachusetts, Lowell, Ethical conduct, Impermissible Benefits, Recruiting Violations, CARA Violations
Key Takeaways: Provide financial aid education to student-athletes including permissible sources of financial aid and who they should reach out to regarding financial aid opportunities.
Level: Level I – Mitigated (institution) and Level I – Aggravated (former head coach)
Facts: The former head men’s soccer coach violated ethical conduct rules when he told a student-athlete to pay him thousands of dollars from the student-athlete’s scholarship refund check. He also provided impermissible benefits to student-athletes, violated CARA regulations, had impermissible recruiting communications, and had COVID-19 recruiting violations.
The student-athlete reported that he was not on scholarship his sophomore year but the former head coach provided him with $2,000 in case to help pay his rent. The following year the student-athlete was put on scholarship and received a $10,000 refund check to pay for his off-campus living expenses. The former head coach directed the student-athletes to give him the $10,000 in cash. The student-athlete paid the former head coach $7,000 over four installments and then used the remaining $3,000 to pay for a summer course. The student-athlete had not been notified his aid was being reduced and had done nothing to warrant his aid being reduced so this was a violation of NCAA rules.
The former head coach also provided impermissible benefits to two men’s soccer student-athletes by providing them cash loans and allowing the use of his second car to a third student-athlete. This resulted in the student-athletes competing in games while ineligible.
During the fall of 2020 the team’s season had been cancelled but the school would have permitted the team to have limited on-campus practices. However, the former head coach told the school they would not be practicing and then held off-campus practices with the entire team. The former head coach never declared a playing season since he told compliance the team would not be participating in CARA. This resulted in impermissible practices and exceeded CARA limitations.
The former head coach also had impermissible contact with a PSA that was enrolled at a DIII school. The PSA had been planning to attend the institution but then was not admitted and enrolled at DIII school. The former head coach continued to contact the PSA while enrolled at the DIII school without receiving authorization from the DIII school. The PSA later transferred to UMass Lowell and participated in 17 contests while ineligible.
There was also a violation of the Covid-19 dead period when the former head coach and former assistant coach directed a current student-athlete to provide a tour to a PSA during the dead period.
The former head coach also failed to cooperate with the Enforcement staff when he refused to provide truthful and complete information. He violated head coach responsibility rules and failed to promote an atmosphere of compliance.
Bylaw Violations Found:
Penalties:
Core Penalties for Level I – Institution
Core Penalties for Level I – Aggravated Violations
Additional Penalties for Level I – Mitigated Violations